School Techy
School Techy
Modules
AdmissionsStudent InformationFees & FinanceAttendanceExaminationsTimetableTransportHostelLibraryHR & Payroll
Solutions
Colleges Universities Coaching institutes Mobile app Integrations
Company
Pricing All features About Case studies Security Resources Blog Partners Contact Sign in
Start free trial
For colleges & junior colleges

College management software: built for schools, and it fits most colleges properly

Programmes and batches instead of classes and sections, semesters instead of terms, subject-wise attendance and internal assessment — on the same student record and the same accounting ledger.

Start a 14-day free trial
No card required · We will tell you if it is a poor fit
The student list configured for a college, showing programme, batch and semester
Suited to Degree colleges Junior colleges B.Ed & D.El.Ed Polytechnics Autonomous colleges
The difference

What a college needs that a school does not

A college is not a school with older students. The structural differences are real: a student belongs to a programme rather than a class, moves through semesters rather than annual terms, chooses electives that break the tidy assumption that everyone in a batch studies the same subjects, and pays fees that are often per semester with a government scholarship component. All four of those are supported. What is not supported is a credit-based CBCS transcript, and that is worth knowing before a demo rather than after.

  • 01 Programmes and batches, not classes and sections A B.Com 2026 intake is a batch within a programme. Roll numbers, fee structures and attendance all attach to it the way they attach to a class in a school.
  • 02 Semesters with their own assessment Internal assessment, practicals and the end-semester examination each with their own weight in the result. Semester-wise mark sheets rather than one annual report card.
  • 03 Electives that actually split a batch Subject allocation is per student, not per batch, so attendance and marks follow the elective a student chose rather than what the batch nominally studies.
  • 04 Fees per semester, with scholarships Semester-wise instalments, government scholarship and reimbursement components recorded as separate heads so the receivable from the state is visible separately from the receivable from the student.
The student record adapted for colleges
Vocabulary

How the model maps to colleges

The software was built around a school’s structure. Where your vocabulary differs, this is what it corresponds to — and where there is no correspondence, that is said too.

In your institution In School Techy Notes
Programme (B.Com, B.Sc) Course / stream Direct equivalent
Batch (2026 intake) Class Direct equivalent
Section or division Section Direct equivalent
Semester Term with its own weight Direct equivalent
Elective / optional subject Per-student subject allocation Supported — attendance and marks follow the student
Internal assessment + end semester Weighted exam terms Direct equivalent
Credits and CBCS transcript Not modelled. Marks and grades, not credit hours
Backlog / supplementary exam A re-examination term for those students Workable, not purpose-built
Affiliation return to a university Data export in the format required Manual export, no portal integration
Hostel, transport, library Same modules Direct equivalent
Fit

Where this is a good fit, and where it is not

The honest version. A college evaluating this should read the second half of this list as carefully as the first.

Good fit: junior and degree colleges on a marks system
If your results are marks and grades with internal and external components, everything works as intended and you gain a real accounting ledger most college software does not have.
Good fit: fee collection at scale
Semester fees, scholarship components, government reimbursement receivables and online payment, all posting to a double-entry ledger with periods that close.
Good fit: attendance you must be able to defend
Subject-wise attendance with shortfall lists against your minimum — which is the figure that decides examination eligibility and gets challenged.
Poor fit: credit-based CBCS transcripts
Credits, credit hours and CGPA computed on credits are not modelled. If your university mandates a credit transcript, this will not produce it and you should not buy on the assumption that it will.
Poor fit: research, PhD and thesis administration
Supervisor allocation, thesis milestones and viva records are not here. A postgraduate research department will need something else for that part.
Ask us: affiliation and NAAC reporting
The underlying data exists and exports cleanly. Whether it matches the exact return your university or NAAC wants is a question to answer on the call, with your format in front of us.
Practicalities

Migrating a college mid-session

Colleges rarely get to change systems in the gap between sessions, because there is no gap — a semester ends and the next admissions cycle has already begun. The practical approach is to bring the current batches across with their outstanding balances and start clean from the current semester, keeping the previous system read-only for historical mark sheets.

What we import: students by programme and batch, guardians, documents where you have them digitally, outstanding fee balances per student, the fee structure for the current semester, and the opening ledger balance. What we deliberately do not import: several years of historical marks, unless you specifically need them for transcripts, because the mapping between an old system’s assessment model and this one is where a migration silently corrupts data.

The reconciliation we show you before anything goes live is three numbers: student count per batch, total outstanding, and opening ledger balance. If those three match your existing records you can trust the rest. If they do not, we find out why first.

Questions

Questions from colleges

Something not answered here?

Do you support credit-based CBCS?
No — and this is the most important answer on this page. Results are marks and grades with weighted components, not credits and credit hours, and CGPA is computed on grades rather than on credits. If your affiliating university mandates a credit-based transcript, this product will not produce one. Several junior and degree colleges on a marks system use it happily; a CBCS-mandated autonomous college should look elsewhere for the transcript, or talk to us about whether the rest is worth having anyway.
How do electives work if half a batch takes one subject?
Subject allocation is per student rather than per batch, so a student taking Statistics and one taking Economics each carry their own subject list. Attendance is marked against the subject, marks are entered against the subject, and the semester mark sheet shows what that student actually studied. This is the difference between college and school software that most products get wrong.
Can we handle government scholarship and reimbursement?
Yes, as separate fee heads with their own receivable. The amount due from the student and the amount due from the state are distinguishable, which matters when the reimbursement arrives eleven months late and somebody has to reconcile it. Both post to the ledger, so the receivable is visible in the balance sheet rather than in a note.
Does attendance support the 75% eligibility rule?
Yes. Subject-wise attendance percentages are computed from the register, and a shortfall list against whatever minimum you set is a report. Because the register carries a correction trail with actor, time and reason, a challenged attendance figure has an answer — which is the whole point when eligibility is being decided.
What about backlog and supplementary examinations?
Workable rather than purpose-built. You create a re-examination term containing only the students and subjects concerned, and the result is recorded against them. It does not model a formal backlog register with attempt counts, so if that is central to your process, raise it on the call.
Can one login cover a school and a college under the same trust?
Yes — this is a common arrangement and it is exactly what the multi-campus model is for. Each institution is a campus with its own structure, staff, fee heads and books, and the trust sees a comparison across them. A school campus can use classes while a college campus uses programmes and batches.
Do you produce NAAC or AISHE data?
The underlying data is all there and exports cleanly, but we do not claim to produce a specific NAAC or AISHE return. Bring the format you have to file and we will tell you on the call which fields come straight out and which you would assemble — rather than promising compliance and discovering the gap in December.
Is there a student portal and app?
Yes. Students see their timetable, subject-wise attendance, internal assessment marks, semester results, fee dues with online payment, and library issues. Parents get their own login where a college involves them, which many junior colleges do.
Next step

Tell us your structure and we will tell you if it fits

Programmes, batches, how you assess, whether credits are mandated. Twenty minutes and you will have a straight answer rather than a proposal.

  • No card required
  • Your data stays yours — export any time
  • Setup help included

No card required. We reply within one working day and never share your details.